Companies often decide to get serious about pricing and reach for a single fix. They buy software. They hire a pricing leader. They run a sales training. A few quarters later the numbers haven’t moved as much as they hoped, and pricing slides back onto the CFO’s list of things that never quite got solved.
The problem is rarely the fix they chose. It’s that they stopped at one or two. A durable pricing capability rests on three legs. A company can set a strong strategy and hire someone to own it, and still find the capability will not hold. Two legs do not make a stool.
Leg 1: Strategy, tools, and process
The first leg is the architecture: A pricing strategy, the tools that support it, and the processes that make it sustainable. The strategy decides how you segment customers and products, where you hold pricing power, and how price connects to value and cost. The processes govern how prices get set, changed, and escalated, so exceptions get decided by policy instead of one deal at a time.
You can tell when this leg is missing. Ask why a price is what it is, and the answer is a cost-plus habit, a grandfathered number, or whatever the rep believed the customer would accept. Two customers of the same size, buying the same mix, pay twenty points apart, and no one can say which price is right, because nothing defines what right looks like. Every deal is an exception, because there is no rule for it to be an exception to. The cost is not any single deal. It is that the company has no way to recognize a bad one.
Leg 2: The people who own it
The second leg is the pricing leader and team who turn strategy into daily decisions. They run the deal desk and hold the line on exceptions, refresh segmentation and price bands, watch realization and variance, and keep the model and dashboards current. A big part of the job is cross-functional: Seeing the whole board and keeping every function rowing the same direction, aligned to one strategy.
Pricing that belongs to everyone belongs to no one. Sales wants volume, Finance wants margin, and Marketing wants a premium position. Left alone, each optimizes its own number, and price drifts from the strategy. The loudest voice in the room ends up setting the price, and the strategy fails while every function hits its number.
The role is full-time and permanent, not a project. Pricing decisions never stop, so the seat cannot sit empty.
Leg 3: The people who negotiate the price
The third leg is the people who set price with the customer: The Sales reps in B2B, the Partners in services. Their daily decisions become the company's realized margin.
Unprepared, they discount at the first sign of resistance, and a point of price gets treated as a small give. When the customer pushes, the conversation defaults to price, because the rep has nothing else to negotiate with. The stakes are the power of one percent: A point of price is worth more to profit than a point of volume or a point of cost, so a discount must buy a lot of extra volume just to break even. Margin goes out the door one reasonable-sounding concession at a time, given away by reps who never saw the math.
In my experience this leg gets neglected most, and it is the hardest to build from scratch. The work is equipping them with language for value, a method for the negotiation, and the confidence to hold a price they can defend. A presentation does not make those stick. Even applying the concepts to their own accounts can fall short when it comes from outside, and outside includes their own Pricing team. When I ran the training from the pricing leader seat, it still landed as a "Pricing team thing." The point is not just to inform the Sales team but to get them to own it. You know that has happened when the ideas show up in how they talk about the business day-to-day.
Why the metaphor holds
No leg holds weight without the other two:
· Lose the leader, and the strategy goes stale
· Lose the strategy, and the leader runs from one fire to the next
· Lose the negotiators, and the strategy and the leader get discounted away
That interdependence is why it is a stool, not a checklist.
The constraint is time
In theory, one strong internal team could build all three legs and own the day-to-day on top of it.
The catch is urgent versus important. The important work is the build: The strategy, the tools, the processes, and the training. The urgent cannot wait. The negotiations on the desk this week need support now, and no one can pause them to go build. And the less of the important that is in place, the more urgent there is. A deal without a guardrail becomes an escalation. A rep who cannot hold price, or grasp what a discount costs, becomes another. That build often takes years, and few owners have the patience to wait for the team to fit the important around the urgent.
That is where outside help comes in, and there is a form of it for each leg. A consulting or software partner for the strategy and tools, a search partner for the pricing leader and team, a training partner for the negotiators. Each stands its leg up in far less time and frees the team for the urgent. And each brings patterns from many companies that an internal team may not have. But outside help only gets the legs up. Keeping the stool standing, year after year, is the work of the people inside.
Where to start
Start by being honest about which leg is weakest, because that is usually where the return is highest. Then commit to all three. A company that stops at one or two and calls it a pricing capability has bought an expensive place to not sit down.
Supported by
